US victorious over China in Intellectual Property Rights dispute
2/02/2009
On Monday, 26 January 2009, a World Trade Organisation (WTO) dispute settlement panel decided in favour of the U.S. on issues relating to China’s Intellectual Property Rights regime. The U.S. alleged that China adopted a slack approach to the enforcement of copyright and trademark violations. The WTO panel agreed and found that certain parts of China’s Intellectual Property scheme are incoherent with its obligations in respect of several international treaties, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) being one such treaty. The panel reported that certain provisions of China’s copyright law are inconsistent with the TRIPS Agreement since they “nullify or impair benefits accruing to the United States.” Peter Allgeier, acting U.S. Trade Representative had the following to say:
“Today, a WTO panel found that a number of deficiencies in China’s Intellectual Property Rights regime are incompatible with its WTO obligations. These findings are an important victory, because they confirm the importance of Intellectual Property Rights protection and enforcement, and clarify key provisions of the TRIPS Agreement. Having achieved this significant legal ruling, we will engage vigorously with China on appropriate corrective actions to ensure that U.S. rights holders obtain the benefits of this decision.”
Wynand Fourie
wynand-f@adamsadams.co.za
CANDIDATE ATTORNEY
| |
Featured Act
Consumer Protection Act enters into force
|
|
Featured Case Law
The need to properly & accurately describe immovable property in a deed of sale
In the matter of Lombaard vs Droprop CC and Others, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) was called on to adjudicate on the validity of an agreement of sale concluded when an option was exercised.
Briefly, the purchaser applied for an order compelling the sellers to transfer certain immovable property to him. The purchaser alleged that an agreement of sale had come into being pursuant to the exercise of an option to purchase, contained in an agreement of lease between him (as the lessee) and the seller (as the lessor). |
|
Related People
James Davies
Partner
Patent Attorney
Tel: +27 (0) 12 432 6237
Email me
|
|
|