Dario Tanziani multiple listed in International Who’s Who Legal
28/05/2008
Dario Tanziani, partner at Adams & Adams and chairman of the patent department, has been listed as one of the world’s pre-eminent life sciences lawyers in the International Who’s Who of Life Sciences Lawyers 2008 and as one of world’s pre-eminent patent attorneys in the International Who’s Who of Business Lawyers 2009 (the latter for the fifth consecutive year). Dario has also been listed in the 2008 edition of Practical Law Company’s annual publication, Which Lawyer? as a recommended patent practitioner.
Since 1996 Who's Who Legal has identified the foremost legal practitioners in 29 areas of business law. Its website, whoswholegal.com, features over
9 000 of the world’s leading private practice lawyers from more than 100 national jurisdictions. As a reference source for companies seeking to confirm the reputations of expert lawyers, the company’s service reduces the short-term costs of finding a lawyer and minimises the transactional expense and risk of receiving poor counsel.
Dario has 26 years experience in patent law, having handled many litigious and pre-litigious matters on behalf of multinational clients in the pharmaceutical and consumer products areas. He currently chairs the patent department but remains involved in patent litigation matters in addition to other areas of the patent practice of the firm.
| |
Featured Act
Plant breeders' rights Act 15 of 1976
To provide for a system whereunder plant breeders� rights relating to varieties of certain kinds of plants may be granted and registered; for the requirements which have to be complied with for the grant of such rights; for the protection of such rights and the grant of licences in respect of the exercise thereof; and to provide for incidental matters. Download act |
|
Featured Case Law
Clean up the register before enforcing your design
In an application to the High Court to enforce an order of the Supreme Court of Appeal, it was successfully argued on behalf of the first, second and third respondents, who are our clients, that the proceedings to enforce the order should be stayed until the determination of a pending review application. The order of the Supreme Court of Appeal interdicts one of the respondents from infringing a registered design. The pending review application was instituted by another of the respondents. |
|
Related People
Dario Tanziani
Chairman - Partner
Patent Attorney
Tel: +27 (0) 12 432 6000
Email me
|
|
|