Counterfeit Drugs - Uganda may follow in Kenya’s footsteps to the dismay of India
17/03/2009
Uganda is considered to be the fourth largest importer of generic drugs from India, with Africa accounting for 14% of India’s US$8 billion export of medicines.
The Ugandan Anti-Counterfeit Bill, which is currently being discussed, is similar to the Kenyan one which caused a major uproar when it was accepted by the Kenyan government. It is currently awaiting signature by the president of Kenya.
In both Bills, the term “counterfeiting” is defined as the manufacture, production, packaging, re-packaging, labelling or making, whether in the country or elsewhere, without the authority of the owner, of any intellectual property right subsisting in the country or elsewhere. It is argued that this definition would result in medicines produced and imported from India (no patent protection) into Uganda (no patent protection) as counterfeit if there was patent protection in any other part of the world.
The Bill also intends to make transit or trans-shipment of counterfeit goods illegal and allows border measures against such goods.
As a result of the above, the Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance is up in arms and maintains that the countries have been influenced by multinational lobbyists. It also maintained that if the Bills were to be enacted, then India would be deprived of its export market.
Alexis Apostolidis Partner
alexis-a@adamsadams.co.za
Adams & Adams
| |
Featured Act
Eviction of unlawful occupiers
Owners of rental properties will be pleased to take note of the hard-hitting comments made by a judge of the South Gauteng High Court in a recent matter involving an application for the eviction of illegal tenants from a building in Johannesburg.
In his judgment, Willis J mentioned obiter that there is effectively only one legal remedy for the unlawful occupation of immovable property, namely an eviction order. |
|
Featured Case Law
South Africa: a debtor’s paradise or not?
In terms of Section 86(10) of the National Credit Act No. 34 of 205 (“the NCA”), where a consumer is in default under a credit agreement that is being reviewed in terms of that Section, the credit provider in respect of that agreement may give notice in the prescribed manner to the consumer, to terminate that review, to the debt counsellor and the National Credit Regulator, at any time at least 60 business days after the date on which the consumer applied for debt review. |
|
Related People
Alexis Apostolidis
Partner: Patent Litigation - Head : Competition Law Group
Patent Attorney
Tel: +27 (0) 12 432 6202
Email me
|
|
|