Know what you are buying for personal use & be careful of what you buy for resale.
30/08/2011
As we are all aware, Intellectual Property Law is a large part of what we do at Adams & Adams. Our litigation teams are focused on combating the infringement of our client’s intellectual property rights on a daily basis. This applies particularly to matters in which we take action on behalf of our clients to curb the smuggling of counterfeit goods into the Republic or prevent the sale of such goods in this country. It is therefore extremely important that we, as a firm, all understand what counterfeit goods are, what the consequences are of dealing in such goods and how we can protect ourselves and our clients from harm caused by counterfeit goods.
Counterfeiting is a global problem. It is not only a recognised economic parasite which diminishes brand value, subverts government tax revenue and reduces our clients’ profits, it also creates a real danger to end consumers.
A growing trend in South Africa is that counterfeit goods are not limited to everyday items such as clothing, jewellery, cigarettes, cellphone accessories etc, but extend to even highly sophisticated industries such as the motor vehicle, foodstuff and cosmetics industries, to mention but a few.
In terms of the South African Counterfeit Goods Act (CGA), any person found dealing in counterfeit goods, which means being in possession of such goods for purposes of trade, importing, marketing, displaying for sale, distributing, bartering or exchanging counterfeit goods, is subject to both criminal and civil sanctions. The CGA provides a maximum penalty in respect of first time offenders of R5000 per item, or 3 years imprisonment. Repeat offenders face a maximum fine of R10 000 per item, or 5 years imprisonment. It is clear that dealing in counterfeit goods is a serious crime with very serious consequences.
The bottom line is that, any person wishing to import branded goods, for purposes of trading in those goods, or selling and/or offering for sale branded goods, should ensure that such goods are supplied or purchased from the owner of the relevant copyright or trade marks, or from persons authorised to distribute or to sell such goods. Ignorance is not bliss as the CGA places an obligation on persons importing or selling such goods to take all reasonable steps to ensure that those are not counterfeit.
Depending on the nature and type of the counterfeit goods, such goods could potentially be detrimental to your health (for example counterfeit foodstuffs) or most likely to put your life at risk (counterfeit motor vehicle brake pads or mag wheels).
Finally, while counterfeit goods are generally of poor quality, it is not always easy to distinguish counterfeit from genuine products. However, if, for example, the price is too good to be true for any particular product, this should raise an alarm in your mind that such product is probably not a genuine item.
| |
Featured Act
Plant breeders' rights Act 15 of 1976
To provide for a system whereunder plant breeders� rights relating to varieties of certain kinds of plants may be granted and registered; for the requirements which have to be complied with for the grant of such rights; for the protection of such rights and the grant of licences in respect of the exercise thereof; and to provide for incidental matters. Download act |
|
Featured Case Law
Recognition of a decision on restoration of priority under PCT in South Africa
In terms of the Paris Convention, a patent application may claim priority from a prior filed application in a convention country relating to the same subject matter, provided that the prior filed application in the convention country was lodged not earlier than one year before lodgement of the application claiming priority. In other words, there exists a 12 month period in which to claim priority. Rule 26bis.3 of the regulations of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) makes provision for the restoration of the right to claim priority if an international application has an international filing date which is later than the date on which the priority period expired but within the period of two months from that date. Upon request of the applicant, the receiving Office shall restore the right of priority if the Office finds that a criterion applied by it (“criterion for restoration”) is satisfied, namely, that the failure to file the international application within the priority period: (i) occurred in spite of due care required by the circumstances having |
|
Related People
Godfrey Budeli
Partner
Attorney
Tel: +27 (0) 12 432 6383
Email me
|
|
|