EPO confirms position on the patentability of computer programs
11/08/2010
The Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBoA) of the European Patent Office (EPO) has issued an important decision regarding the patentability of computer programs under the European Patent Convention (EPC). The full decision, which is about 61 pages long, can be found at:
http://www.epo.org/topics/news/2010/20100512.html.
The Enlarged Board of Appeal had to consider four questions referred to it by the President of the EPO in October 2008 regarding points of law which could have a significant impact on this area of law.
The Enlarged Board of Appeal, in developing an opinion, considered the development of case law in the field of software patents and found two conflicting decisions of Boards of Appeal. In appreciation of this, it was stated that “case law in new legal and/or technical fields does not always develop in linear fashion, and that earlier approaches may be abandoned or modified.” The EBoA found that in these decisions there was not sufficient divergence to suggest a conflict in case law but rather that the Boards of Appeal had merely developed the law.
The EPO’s position regarding the patentability of computer-related inventions is to allow patents that at least involve some technical feature, for example, some form of physical hardware. Furthermore, the invention must result in an improvement or step forward on what has been done previously. This is known as a “further technical effect.”
This decision removes all doubt regarding whether the position in law is likely to change and shows that the EPO has now settled into a well-accepted approach. After a rejection of a draft Directive on the patentability of computer programs in 2005, it is unlikely that this matter will be revisited by the EPO in the near future.
This decision carries weight with regards to the patentability of computer programs in South Africa considering that our patent system is largely based on that of the EPO and the United Kingdom.
Wynand FourieCandidate Attorney
wynand-f@adamsadams.co.za
| |
Featured Act
Patent regulations
Government Notice R2470 in Government Gazette 6247 of 15 December 1978 Download act |
|
Featured Case Law
The need to properly & accurately describe immovable property in a deed of sale
In the matter of Lombaard vs Droprop CC and Others, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) was called on to adjudicate on the validity of an agreement of sale concluded when an option was exercised.
Briefly, the purchaser applied for an order compelling the sellers to transfer certain immovable property to him. The purchaser alleged that an agreement of sale had come into being pursuant to the exercise of an option to purchase, contained in an agreement of lease between him (as the lessee) and the seller (as the lessor). |
|
Related People
James Davies
Partner
Patent Attorney
Tel: +27 (0) 12 432 6237
Email me
|
|
|