Can the liquidation (winding-up) of a close corporation be set aside in appropriate circumstances?
20/12/2010
In the matter of
Klass vs Contract Interiors CC (in liquidation) and Others the Johannesburg High Court recently listed the principles to be considered when application is made to set aside the winding-up of a Close Corporation (CC).
The facts of the matter which led to the CC being wound-up are not relevant, suffice to state that in the course of the winding-up of the CC all creditors of the CC (including the South African Revenue Service) and the members were paid and the liquidator supported the application.
It is generally accepted that it is in the court’s discretion to set aside a winding-up proceeding under Section 354 of the Companies Act as read with Section 66 of the Close Corporation’s Act, which is the relevant section which applies to the winding-up of a CC.
In this matter the court held
inter alia that:
1. The court’s discretion is practically unlimited, although it must take into account surrounding circumstances and the wishes of interested parties such as the liquidator, creditor and members.
2. The court should ordinarily not set aside a winding-up where creditors or the liquidators remain unpaid or inadequate provision has been made for the payment of their claims.
3. Where the claims of the liquidator and all creditors have been satisfied, the court should have regard to the wishes of the members of the CC.
As no party was likely to be prejudiced by the order, the court accordingly granted an order setting aside the winding-up of the CC.
The effect of the order was that the CC could continue business in the same name and, in effect, as the same entity in which it conducted its business prior to winding-up thereof.
Clients are reminded that the purpose of winding-up is to ensure that creditors are all treated equally. It is therefore not a given that winding-up of the CC means the end of the CC, as it existed prior to winding-up. The proviso to this is that all claims of all creditors as well as of the liquidators and the members be satisfied. In practice, this does not occur often and there is more often than not a shortfall leading to creditors not being paid.
Leander OppermanPartner
leander-o@adamsadams.co.za
| |
Featured Act
Form P.3 - declaration & power of attorney
Patent Act of 1978, P3 forms: declarations and power of attorney.
Download act |
|
Featured Case Law
The need to properly & accurately describe immovable property in a deed of sale
In the matter of Lombaard vs Droprop CC and Others, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) was called on to adjudicate on the validity of an agreement of sale concluded when an option was exercised.
Briefly, the purchaser applied for an order compelling the sellers to transfer certain immovable property to him. The purchaser alleged that an agreement of sale had come into being pursuant to the exercise of an option to purchase, contained in an agreement of lease between him (as the lessee) and the seller (as the lessor). |
|
Related People
Leander Opperman
Partner
Attorney
Tel: +27 (0) 12 432 6117
Email me
|
|
|