Restrictive horizontal practices
The Competition Act restricts and in some instances prohibits cooperation between competitors.
The Competition Act distinguishes between practices that are prohibited regardless of whether they have any anticompetitive consequences and practices that are prohibited only if the parties to the agreement or practice fail to prove that the practice has pro-competitive effects which outweigh any anticompetitive effects.
The Act lists the following restrictive horizontal practices that are prohibited automatically (“per se”):
- directly or indirectly fixing a purchase or selling price or any other trading condition
- dividing markets by allocating customers, suppliers, territories, or specific types of goods or services
- collusive tendering
An administrative penalty of up to 10% of the transgressing firm’s annual turnover during the firm’s preceding financial year may be imposed on first-time offenders of these prohibitions.
| |
Featured news
Patentees beware of anticompetitive settlements
Patent litigation in South Africa often forms part of a global patent litigation strategy where corresponding patents in jurisdictions such as the US and Europe are also in play.
The patentee may decide to settle the litigation on a global basis, resulting in the litigation being withdrawn in South Africa too. But patentees should make sure the settlement agreement complies with the Competition Act.
In the pharmaceutical sector, the parties sometimes agree that in return for the patentee’s withdrawal of an action for infringement against a generic company, the generic company will launch a competing generic product only a few years after the patentee’s patent expires. This essentially extends the exclusivity of the patentee in respect of its product beyond the life of the patent. |
|
Featured office: Mozambique
Inquiry: (+258) 21 333 200 |
|
|
Featured person: Marais , Jac
Partner
Attorney
Tel: +27 (0) 12 432 6356
|
|
|
|